Question
7: Looking back at your preliminary
task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full
product?
I believe that I have developed as a film maker
very well due to the team I’ve been filming with. I know I’ve grown as a film maker in the editing side because on
day one I didn’t have a clue how to use IMovie but now I know how to work it
and use effects effectively this is due to the team I’ve been working with
because watching them enabled me to get a good understand of how it worked and
then developing my skills on my own by trying out new skills and investigating
how it works and now helping my mates on IMovie just shows me how much I’ve
progressed from the preliminary and how much I’ve developed as a film maker.
My strengthens in film making would be the editing
part. I believe I have picked up this strength via my work partners who are
very good at the technology side of film making. Although this is my strength
there is still a lot of room for improvement but before the prelim I didn’t
know a single thing about editing therefore I believe I’ve improved massively.
Also I believe my main strength which I brought to this team was the planning
and organisation when organising what everyone’s role was I stepped forward and
navigated that and also it was important I kept my blog nice and organized
which I think I did at a good standard.
Some of the specific skills I have developed
were skills such continuity which is a style of editing that requires the
director to try to make the film reality as much like the audience's reality as
possible. This means the film is trying to recreate what the world around us is
and trying to make it easier on the audience to comprehend and understand the
action happening on screen. Within this style of editing there are many terms
or ways of implementing the style. These affects can be used independently of
each other to create desired affects. Also 180 degree rule was key when filming
for us because if we didn’t get this right it would just confuse the audience.
The 180 degree rule is basically The 180-degree
rule of shooting and editing keeps the camera on one side of the action. As a
matter of convention, the camera stays on one side of the axis of action
throughout a scene; this keeps characters grounded compositionally on a
particular side of the screen or frame, and keeps them looking at one another
when only one character is seen onscreen at a time. The technique allows for an
expansion of the frame into the unseen space off-screen. It is referred to as a
rule because the camera, when shooting two actors, must not cross over the axis
of action; if it does, it risks giving the impression that the actors'
positions in the scene have been reversed. Also shot reverse-shot is continuity
editing technique used in conversations or simply characters looking at each
other or objects. A shot showing what the character is supposedly looking at
(either a point of view or over the shoulder shot) is followed by a reverse
angle shot of the character themselves looking at it, or of the other character
looking back at them, for example. Shot reverse shot often ties in with the
180° rule to retain continuity by not distorting the audience’s sense of
location of the characters in the shots. The last editing technique is match on
action this was also key. Match on action is basically is an editing technique
for continuity editing in which one shot cuts to another shot portraying the
action of the subject in the first shot. This creates the impression of a sense
of continuity the action carrying through creates a “visual bridge” which draws
the viewer’s attention away from slight cutting or continuity issues. This is
not a graphic match or match cut; it portrays a continuous sense of the same
action rather than matching two separate things.
The
way we approached filming our opening titles was we had a planning page on our
blogger. This is where we put all our work up and it meant that when it came to
filming we had a clear idea on what we needed to do. The main bit of planning that we needed to carry out
that would help our production was the shot list. This was important because it
meant we was prepared for what we needed to shot when we was out filming.
I
beileve now looking back at our thriller we can improve on such things as
finding a better location which fitted our genre so that we didn’t have to
relie on the edititng so much. Because all we had to work with was a not in use
bridge and some woods I beileve that this opening title was a success. Another
area of improvement was the timing I beileve we could of improved how quickly
we did the editing. The strength of our opening title I beileve was the sound
and the editing it really created the effect we was looking for and applied to
a mass audience.
The
way in which we created and developed our skills from the prelim to the actaul
thriller is massive you can tell we have come a long way from the screenshots
below and how we have developed our skills as time has gone by.
Prelim Actual


The first screenshot is of the titles. We
believed that the titles would look a lot more effective at the end of the
opening titles so we put them at the end. The reasoning behind this is because
in our prelim we didn’t think that the titles stood out at the start of the
opening scene and when researching other film openings they had their titles at
the end of the opening.


These screenshots show you the types of shots we
used. In the prelim we decided to act like someone was watching them from CCTV because
at the time we thought it was an effect way to keep the audience on the edge of
their seats but then we decided that if we could see it from their eyes then
it’ll look more effect so we decided to use point of view shots. The difference
in these shots also is the quality. When filming our prelim on one of the
schools camera we decided it was great quality and to make our filming a lot of
eye catching we opted for using one of our own cameras.


These
two shots have the same description it is them both running away the only
difference is that the editing is a lot better and the positioning of the
shots. In the prelim shot the only thing going on in that shot is the person
running away but on the other hand in the actual thriller opening we have 3 things
going on in a 4 second shot this is important because it tells the viewer that
the movie is going to be action packed and thrilling.
To conclude these opening
titles I believe it went better than I thought it would because once we
finished the filming I thought the shots that we got weren’t great and I didn’t
think we fitted the genre well enough. Also I didn’t think we had enough shots
because we planned on doing quick editing so we would need a lot of shots. But
the editing was done exceptionally well to bring back what I thought would be a
D/C grade to potential A/B. so overall I believe our opening thriller was a
success.